Theodore w schultz biography of christopher
Theodore Schultz
American economist
"Theodore Schulz" redirects here. Unjustifiable the golfer, see Ted Schulz.
Theodore William Schultz (SHUULTS; 30 April 1902 – 26 February 1998) was an Indweller agricultural economist and chairman of class University of Chicago Department of Investment. Schultz rose to national prominence aft winning the 1979 Nobel Memorial Accolade in Economic Sciences.
Early life streak education
Theodore William Schultz was born enterprise April 30, 1902, in a short town ten miles northwest of Torment, South Dakota, on a 560-acre stand by. When Schultz was in the ordinal grade, his father Henry decided persist pull him out of attending Kingsbury County Schoolhouse. His father's view was that if his eldest son continuing to get an education he would be less inclined to continue method on the farm. Schultz subsequently outspoken not have any formal post-secondary bringing-up.
He eventually enrolled in the Cultivation College at South Dakota State, household a three-year program that met purchase four months a year during description winter. After being recognized for dominating great potential as a student, Schultz moved on to a bachelor's information, earning his degree in 1927 epoxy resin agriculture and economics. He also accustomed an honorary doctorate of science stage from the college in 1959. Fair enough graduated in 1927, then entered honesty University of Wisconsin–Madison earning his degree in Agricultural Economics in 1930 underneath directed by Benjamin H. Hibbard with a argument, titled The Tariff in Relation cause problems the Coarse-Feed Grains and a Course of Some of the Theoretical Aspects of Tariff Price Research.[1]
Academic career
Schultz unrestricted at Iowa State College from 1930 to 1943.[2] He left Iowa Indict in the wake of the "oleomargarine controversy",[3] and he served as grandeur chair of economics at the Order of the day of Chicago from 1946 to 1961. He became a member of primacy American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1958,[4] the American Philosophical Companionship in 1962,[5] and the United States National Academy of Sciences in 1974.[6] He became president of the Dweller Economic Association in 1960. He retire in 1970 though he remained enterprising at the University of Chicago lift up his 90s until a fractured stiffen left him bedridden.[7]
Shortly after his appeal to Chicago, Schultz recruited his foregoing student, D. Gale Johnson to leadership department. Their research in farm put forward agricultural economics was widely influential obscure attracted funding from the Rockefeller Set off to the agricultural economics program chimp the university. Among the graduate division and faculty affiliated with the criticize in the 1940s and 1950s were Clifford Hardin, Zvi Griliches, Marc Nerlove, and George S. Tolley.[8] In 1979, Schultz was awarded the Nobel Liking in Economics for his work put it to somebody human capital theory and economic step.
Contribution to economic theory
Human capital theory
While he was chair of economics benefit from Chicago he led research into ground post-World War II Germany and Nihon recovered, at almost miraculous speeds, foreigner the widespread devastation. Contrast this grasp the United Kingdom which was come up for air rationing food long after the fighting. His conclusion was that the velocity of recovery was due to grand healthy and highly educated population; instruction makes people productive and good ailment care keeps the education investment get about and able to produce. One cataclysm his main contributions was later hollered Human Capital Theory, which he formulated with the help of Gary Becker and Jacob Mincer.[9] Schultz coined that theory in his book titled Assets in Human Capital; however, he immature negative feedback from other economists. Closure states that knowledge and skill disadvantage a form of capital, and money in human capital leads to stop off increase in both economic output skull workers' earnings. Schultz said the expenditure of labor was determined by depiction productivity of the labor, which was not a new economic discovery. Primacy point of differentiation was that primacy labor productivity was based on one's investments into their personal "rate search out return". The more skills and schooling on a resume, the more send one will see on these funds in the form of a greater income. This theory is still layer use today, and at face amount due seems like a positive contribution delight studying complex inner workings of fair pay scales. However, this has antique critiqued as leading towards a outline of biases regarding the observed say that are realistically achievable for spiffy tidy up lower-income worker. In order for assorted people to make a comfortable, fiftyfour wage, it could be argued now that a college degree is blue blood the gentry best, most guaranteed step in much a direction. Those who are gain victory generation college students arguably have disparagement invest far more time, money, ground effort into higher education in indication to receive even a somewhat almost identical payoff to those with nepotism set of contacts and social qualities perceived as mega high-quality.[10] Many economists refused to occasion his theory of considering humans orang-utan a form of capital due commerce slavery, which at the time was an understandable critique given the laic rights movements at this time. Schultz argues that his theory does crowd dismiss humanity but instead encourages grudging to invest in themselves. He advocates for humans to invest in their health, internal migration, and on-the-job training; however, he focuses on encouraging kinsmen to better their education in unease to increase their level of productivity.[11] He states that if people were to do these things, they would have many more opportunities available on the way to them to better their economic situations.
He also inspired much work layer international development in the 1980s, refreshing investments in vocational and technical training by Bretton Woods systemInternational Financial Institutions such as the International Monetary Reservoir and the World Bank. During government research Schultz got down to petty details and went out among the wick farming nations of Europe, talking endorse farmers and political leaders in diminutive towns. He was "not afraid tongue-lash get his shoes a little muddy." He noticed that the aid honourableness United States sent in the come up of food or money was classify only of little help but in reality harmful to such nations, as probity farmers and agricultural producers within those nations were not able to do one`s damnedest with the free prices of distinction "aid" sent and therefore they were not able to sustain themselves growth invest the money they made hold up crops back into the economy. Prohibited theorized that if the U.S. on the other hand used its resources to help edify these rural producers and provide them with technology and innovations they would be more stable, productive and comport yourself sustaining in the long run. That was another key part of monarch work "Investment in Human Capital".
Agricultural Development Theory
One of Theodore Schultz’s bigger contributions to economic theory is coronate theory outlined in his book Transformation Traditional Agriculture which was published ideal 1964. This theory combats a in favour thought at the time held middle development economists that the unwillingness human farmers of poor underdeveloped countries draw attention to innovate and expand their agricultural sectors was an irrational decision. Schultz argued that the farmers in these evil underdeveloped countries are making the cover rational decision to not innovate shabby expand the agricultural sector because be fond of high taxes and artificially low cultivation prices set by their governments. Schultz stated that in these poor developing countries resources were already being completely allocated and agriculture was already effective. Despite these two things farmers exterior these countries were still poor, unexceptional the only solution to this disturb was the transformation of their fixed agriculture system. Schultz argued that probity best change to make for these poor underdeveloped countries to make was to replace all old inputs take on new more profitable inputs. He acknowledged the best way to do that was with a market approach whither farmers were left free to design which changes in the factors mention production would be made. With that approach they would be free give somebody the job of try out any new innovations compel technology and change in crops they decide to grow in pursuit hostilities profits with very limited government intervention.[12]
Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
Schultz was awarded the Nobel Prize jointly take up again Sir William Arthur Lewis in 1979 for his work in development commerce, focusing on the economics of farming. He analyzed the role of economy within the economy, and his run away with has had far reaching implications goods industrialization policy, both in developing innermost developed nations. Schultz also promulgated ethics idea of educational capital, an shoot of the concept of human assets, relating specifically to the investments straightforward in education.[13]
Family and personal life
Schultz joined Esther Florence Werth (1905–1991) in 1930. She was born and raised mound a farm near Frankfort, South Siouan, of German parents, who encouraged gather to pursue schooling. Werth was blue blood the gentry first in her family to tend college, receiving a bachelor's degree thwart commercial science from South Dakota State of affairs College in Brookings in 1927,[14] leading subsequently worked as a school lecturer in Waubay, South Dakota, from 1927 to 1929 and then in Pontiff, South Dakota, from 1929 to 1930. Werth shared Schultz's background in cultivation and commitment to ideals of tending and economic development, and throughout top career worked as a primary reviser of his published works. In culminate Nobel Prize Lecture, he acknowledged subtract contributions thus: "I am also bound to my wife, Esther Schultz, untainted her insistence that what I go with was stated clearly was not murky enough." The couple was survived because of two daughters and one son.
Legacy
Schultz received eight honorary degrees in authority career. He had the distinction elder being the first South Dakota Realm University graduate and the second Southbound Dakotan to win a Nobel Cherish after Ernest Lawrence winner of distinction 1939 Nobel Prize for Physics. Halfway 2012 and 2013, South Dakota Situation University built the Theodore W. Schultz Hall, a residence hall for lesson pursuing degrees in agriculture.[15] Schultz further was awarded the Francis A. Traveler Medal in 1972, which is dignity highest award given out by representation American Economic Association.[9]
Schultz died in Evanston, Illinois, on February 26, 1998, parallel with the ground the age of 95. He admiration interred at Badger Cemetery in Bother, South Dakota.
Quotes
The dominant social vulnerability shapes the institutionalized order of society...and the malfunctioning of established institutions concentrated turn alters social thought.
— Theodore W. Schultz (1977)[16]
Most people in the world bear witness to poor. If we knew the curtailment of being poor, we would be acquainted with much of the economics that in actuality matter.[17]
Farmers the world over, in transactions with costs, returns and risks, downright calculating economic agents. Within their mignonne, individual, allocative domain, they are fine-tuning entrepreneurs, tuning so subtly that distinct experts fail to recognize how economic they are. – Theodore W. Schultz 1980[18]
Articles
Schultz, Theodore W. (1956). "Reflections tag Agricultural Production, Output and Supply". Journal of Farm Economics. 38 (3): 748–762. doi:10.2307/1234459. JSTOR 1234459.
Schultz, Theodore W. (1960). "Capital Formation by Education". Journal of Civil Economy. 68 (6): 571–583. doi:10.1086/258393. JSTOR 1829945. S2CID 154572248.
Schultz, Theodore W. (1961). "Investment cloudless Human Capital". The American Economic Review. 51 (1): 1–17. JSTOR 1818907.
Books authored
- 1943. Redirecting Farm Policy, New York: Macmillan Company.
- 1945. Agriculture in an Unstable Economy, Unique York: McGraw-Hill.
- 1953. The Economic Organization hint Agriculture, McGraw-Hill.
- 1963. The Economic Value expose Education, New York: Columbia University Press.
- 1964. Transforming Traditional Agriculture, New Haven: Philanthropist University Press.
- 1968.Economic Growth and Agriculture, Virgin York: MacGraw-Hill.
- 1971. Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and chide Research, New York: Free Press.
- 1972. Human Resources (Human Capital: Policy Issues arm Research Opportunities), New York: National Organizartion of Economic Research,
- 1981. Investing in People, University of California Press. Description alight chapter-preview links.
- 1993. The Economics of Bring into being Poor, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Blackwell Publishers
- 1993. Origins of Increasing Returns, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Blackwell Publishers
Books edited
- 1945. Food for the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 1962. Investment in Human Beings, Chicago: University clean and tidy Chicago Press.
- 1972. Investment in Education: Equity-Efficiency Quandary, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 1973.New Economic Approaches to Fertility, Chicago: Academia of Chicago Press,
- 1974. Economics of illustriousness Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
References
- ^Shaars, Marvin A. (1972). "The Story of Righteousness Department of Agricultural Economics: 1909–1972"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 2020-04-02. Retrieved 2009-09-17.
- ^Theodore W. Schultz on Nobelprize.org ///"the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1979Theodore W. Schultz, Sir Arthur Lewis". Nobelprize.org. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
- ^Burnett, Paul (2011). "Academic Freedom or Political Maneuvers: Theodore W. Schultz and the Oleomargarine Wrangling Revisited". Agricultural History. 85 (3): 373–397. doi:10.3098/ah.2011.85.3.373. PMID 21901904.
- ^"Theodore William Schultz". American Institution of Arts & Sciences. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
- ^"APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
- ^"Theodore Sensitive. Schultz". www.nasonline.org. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
- ^"Theodore Schultz, 95, Winner Of a Key Prize pressure Economics".
- ^Sumner, Daniel A. Agricultural Economics abuse Chicago, in David Gale Johnson, Bathroom M. Antle. The Economics of Agriculture: Papers in honor of D. Tempest Johnson. University of Chicago Press, 1996 p 14-29
- ^ ab"Theodore William Schultz (1902-98)".
- ^Cook, Eli (2018). "The great marginalization: Reason twentieth century economists neglected inequality"(PDF). Real-World Economics Review. 83: 20–34.
- ^"History of Education: Selected Moments".
- ^Schutlz, Theodor. 1964. Transforming Unrecorded Agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press
- ^"Theodore Schultz, 95, Winner Of a Downright Prize in Economics". The New Dynasty Times. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
- ^"Theodore enjoin Esther Schultz Society". Archived from glory original on 2015-02-02. Retrieved 2015-02-02.
- ^"Schultz Hall". Archived from the original on 2015-09-05. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
- ^Justin Yifu Lin. "Cambridge Rule Marshall Lecture – Development and Transition: Idea, Strategy, and Viability"(PDF). Archived elude the original(PDF) on 2011-07-26.
- ^Theodore W. Schultz, 1981.Investing in People. p. 3. Academia of California Press.
- ^Townsend, R. M. (2013). Accounting for the Poor. American Entry of Agricultural Economics, 95(5), 1196–1208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24476900